top of page
Research into Magazine Film Reviews

Definition of the noun 'review': a critical article or report, as in a periodical, on a book, play, recital,or the like; critique; evaluation.

Film reviews involve critics evaluating a film for newspapers, magazines, broadcast media, and online publications, particularly for new releases. These reviews have an important impact on whether people decide to see a film or not, as it gives the reader and overall verdict through a 5 star rating system; poor star ratings lead to financial loss. All films, benefit from a positive film review as they increase box office/internet viewing figures.  

Famous film magazines on the current market include - Empire, Total Film and Sight & Sound.

 

 

 

 

 

A British film magazine which is published monthly by Bauer Consumer Media; the first issue being published in 1989. It is the biggest selling magazine in the UK , outselling its market rival Total film and is also published in Australia, Turkey and Russia. Empire is a popular in both approach and coverage and reviews both mainstream films and art films. A regular feature since issue 167 is the masterpiece feature (a two-page essay on a film selected by Empire in the Re.View section). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A British film magazine published 13 times a year by Future publishing. The magazine was launched in 1997 and offers film, DVD and Blu-ray news, reviews and features. Each month, Total Film provides a range of features, from full-length interviews with actors and directors, to major film previews and retrospective pieces. A key section within the magazine is 'Screen' - the main cinema reviews section. The company also include a 'Predicted Interest Curve', which is a graph that demonstrates which moments of a film are likely to hold the viewer's attention and a short verdict. Smaller films receive a concise review and rating and the end of the section is mainly devoted to the current U.S. and UK box office charts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A British monthly film magazine published by the British Film Institute (BFI) and was first published in 1932. The magazine reviews all film releases each month, including those with a limited (art house) release, as opposed to most film magazines which concentrate on those films with a general release. Sight & Sound also features a full cast and crew credit list for each reviewed film, making them different from their competitors. Every decade, the company asks an international group of film professionals to vote for their greatest film of all time, in which critics are asked to provide a top ten list. 

 

 

Conventions of Magazine Film Reviews (Layout):

 

  • Film title is bold, enlarged and usually at the top of the page to capture the reader’s attention.

The title is the most vital part of the review because it’s the first thing the reader will see.

 

  • Colour may additionally be added to make the title or the rest of the review more appealing and not so dull.

 

  • A large image of a scene within the film is generally put in the middle, dominating the page or sometimes the review will use lots of smaller images of various key scenes.

(Including images from the film allows reader to have a brief glimpse of the film. This helps them to construct their own opinion as to whether or not they want to see the film or keep reading the review, based on the images provided).

 

  • Taglines for a review are placed near the top of the page and are often humorous and a play on words.

  • Reviews also include general information on the film, which is typically presented at the top or side of the page in a small box to highlight the key information.

This includes the release date, certificate (BBFC), director, main actors (celebrities) and the running time.

 

  • A brief description of the plot (synopsis) is used to tell the reader what the film is about, persuading them to continue reading the review and watch the film.

  • Reviews may have another box containing extra information on the film – a closer look

 

  • The name of the reviewer is placed at the end of the main article (review).

  • The reviewer or other critics’ responses (e.g. the newspaper, Rotten Tomatoes etc.) on the film are added towards the end of the review with a star rating, providing the reader with an overall verdict

Below are 3 film magazine film review 'layout' deconstructions. The basis of the design of film reviews is generally the same, regardles of it being a feature film or a short; positionings and the occasional added extras may differ depending on the film magazine company.

The Total Film review doesn't include a plot summary (synopsis) like the other two magazines - Empire and Sight & Sound. The layouts of all the film reviews differ, but they all include a large, dominant image that takes up a large part of the A3 spread, in order to attract the reader. Additionally, Total Film includes a 'Predicted Interest Curve', while Empire has their own start rating system so the reader can understand the critic's specific verdict. Moreover, the Sight & Sound review includes credits from the film and secondary images, but doesn't provide a star rating, leaving the reader to make their own verdict and decide whether or not they want to see the film.

Analysis of Content within Magazine Film Reviews: (Related to "Documentaries" and "Short Films")

The content of Sight & Sound magazine film reviews are more relevant to us because unlike Total Film and Empire, they are the most likely to review short films or documentaries in general. 

'Amy' directed by Asif Kapadia 

 

In July 2015, the film 'Amy' was reviewed by Sight & Sound magazine twice as it was rated one of the best films of the year. The documentary included home footage, archived material and music recordings to aid the narrative of the famous 'Back to Black' singer who struggled with addictions, an eating disorder and a toxic relationship, until her death in aged 27 in 2011. 

 

Snippets from the second double page spread (Film of the Month) review in Sight & Sound magazine:

 

Reviewed by Jane Giles 

 

"It’s a killer opening; less than a minute into the film and I’m already choking back tears. There’s no spoiler alert needed here – surely everyone knows that the precociously talented girl who was Amy Winehouse would be dead by 27, a member along with Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison, Brian Jones and Kurt Cobain of what Cobain’s mother called “that stupid club”. It was all over the press, and her death was deeply affecting to millions. As with Asif Kapadia’s documentary Senna (2010), Amy is composed almost entirely of archive footage, with no talking heads or single overarching commentary. We hear from a large cast of characters – Amy’s parents, friends and collaborators, such as Mark Ronson, Yasiin Bey (the former Mos Def) and Salaam Remi, plus some wise words from doctors and drug counsellor Chip Somers – who are credited as they speak, though the director keeps his own name off the picture until the very end. The effect of this is to make Amy seem not only the subject but the author of her own story; Amy utilises a very wide range of types of film footage – archive, mobile phone, news, home video – and she’s in almost every frame, her voice heard throughout. "

 

"In Amy ‘the voice’ is augmented by the word, and the visuals are often overlaid with writing. Amy’s childish handwriting, covered in little love hearts, floats across the screen, and the poetry of her lyrics is written out for us to read as the songs play, resonating deeply with what we know to have been going on in her life. In addition to onscreen credits that keep track of who’s speaking, Kapadia continually documents place names and key dates, as Amy gets back with Blake, marries him in 2007 and divorces a couple of years later. The events feel uncomfortably close to home as, more or less chronologically, the film moves inexorably towards Amy’s relatively recent death."

 

"Midway, the film becomes grueling, and the endless chaotic flashlights and dizzying mobile-phone visuals hard to bear. There are some shocking images in this desperately sad, judicious but overlong film, which itself could be read as part of the problem – a symptom of the public’s endless appetite for misery and seeing stars self-destruct. But while walking this fine line, ultimately the film neither wallows in Amy’s fate nor glamorizes her tragedy. All of this makes Amy essential viewing, not least for the audience of young women who will be drawn to it. If it’s distressing to watch, imagine how it felt to be her."

 

"Documentaries are often more suited to television than cinema but, like Senna with its drive for speed and sound of roaring engines, Amy is definitely one for the big screen: big eyes, big hair, big eyeliner, big sound. On screen, the film’s title is her name in big bold capital letters and it packs a huge emotional impact. With the rights to her music controlled by Mitch Winehouse, Amy’s story will surely become a biopic one day, like most of the others in ‘that stupid club’. But it’s hard to imagine that a significantly different version will be told, because from his multiple interviewees and the vast amount of archive, Kapadia has drawn together a single but collective point of view: Amy was an adult, not a child. She liked alcohol and drugs. The paparazzi are awful. And she was one of the greats."

This first paragraph is 9 lines into the review and the reader is immediately drawn into the plot, characters and documentary conventions that the film involves. For instance, home footage from a range of mediums and a voiceovers from Amy's past interviews, which was very key, as after watching the film on Channel 4 this January, I felt that hearing Amy's voice gave it a more personal touch, evoking the audience to feel more emotional at the thought of such a talented person's death.

 

The reviwer also opens this paragraph with the word 'killer', suggesting that in her opinion, the film is impressive.

Key: 

  • Green - reference to documentary conventions

  • Blue - personal comments on the film

The critic ends the magazine film review with the director's main message/purpose of the documentary - to portray Amy as a normal, imperfect human being who faced a few bumps on the road to fame like all famous stars do. However, Kapadia ultimately points out that she was one of the greatest singers of all time and we should remember because of this, not because of her bad experiences with drugs or alcohol, which the media loved to focus on.

As you can see via the blue highlighting, reviewer Jane Giles has included her personal views on the documentary film. In doing so, she has made the review her own; it is unique and her emotive language draws upon the "R.I.P Amy Winehouse" tribute, thus pulling at the readers' heart-strings and making them want to watch the film to embark in this "emotional rollercoaster" atmosphere.

MUSICAL YOUTH

'Loft' by Marc Issacs

 

The short film documentary follows filmmaker Marc Isaacs who sets himself up in a London tower block lift; residents come to trust and talk to him, reveal the things that matter to them, creating a humorous and moving portrait of a vertical community.

(25 mins)

 

Here is an extract from a review of 'Lift' from Gorilla Film Magazine - an independant platform for fresh-faced filmmakers and low budget films:

 

Reviewed by James Hocking

 

Emotive and Confined: Marc Isaacs is a North London-born documentary filmmaker with a passion and flare for bringing those on the fringes of our society to centre stage. His documentary films to date include Lift, All White in Barking, Travellers and the harrowing Calais: The Last Border. His films force the viewer to look without judging eyes at people who remain on the lower rungs of our communities. Those ghosts in the background who work the unskilled jobs, speak with simple tongues and return home alone at night.

These common characteristics of his work are perhaps best displayed in Lift, possibly due to the sheer simplicity of the idea and the confinement of its subjects, but also because of the distinct sense of pathos we get from the wry smiles and faintly sardonic remarks made by them.

 

Isaacs spent two months in the elevator of an East London tower block, speaking to the residents as they went on their daily commute. London’s multicultural nature ensures Isaacs encounters a diverse range of people, different colours, creeds and ages. The superficial yet clear divide in many of the tower’s residents is something which undoubtedly contributes to conveying the film’s message.

 

What is particularly interesting is the confidence that builds between Isaacs and the characters. A confidence that grows simply from being present in such a familiar and confined space, often without any real engagement at all.

The content within this short film review (extract) also signifies to the directors' powerful message about those considered as the 'lower class' community within the tower block; the reviewer particularly focuses on the way Issacs documentary films force you question the world we live in.

In conclusion, the content of film reviews mainly include:

 

  • Emotive Language

  • Adjectives

  • Directors' Intentions - the overall message that director(s) want to put across to their audience

  • Comments on the camera &/ editing skills e.g. documentary conventions

  • Brief information about the actors' backgrounds

  • Personal opinions

By Ashley Fontaine

This research was the core basis of our ancillary as it informed us on the types of things we should include when creating our review.

bottom of page